<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad Phone Fees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2009/11/01/bad-phone-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2009/11/01/bad-phone-fees/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:51:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fields</title>
		<link>http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2009/11/01/bad-phone-fees/comment-page-1/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Fields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/?p=648#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>The problem is that Google IS NOT &quot;taking on&quot; anything. They are illegally blocking access to these exchanges in order to avoid paying access fees. This is a tactic that AT&amp;T, Verizon, and many other phone providers have tried for years - and failed - because the FCC has ruled that they cannot block consumer access to these numbers. Google has not decided to join with AT&amp;T and others to take this on, instead they are trying to hide behind telecoms laws and claiming that they are a data service - the same laws that Vonage and other VoIP providers also tried to use, and also failed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is that Google IS NOT &#8220;taking on&#8221; anything. They are illegally blocking access to these exchanges in order to avoid paying access fees. This is a tactic that AT&amp;T, Verizon, and many other phone providers have tried for years &#8211; and failed &#8211; because the FCC has ruled that they cannot block consumer access to these numbers. Google has not decided to join with AT&amp;T and others to take this on, instead they are trying to hide behind telecoms laws and claiming that they are a data service &#8211; the same laws that Vonage and other VoIP providers also tried to use, and also failed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

