http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/ Mon, 06 Apr 2015 15:54:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-21790 Wed, 27 Aug 2014 03:09:46 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-21790 […] I would do silly things like give huge tax breaks to trust fund babies, but those kinds of changes won’t amount to much. You have to fix the health care system. We […]

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-7147 Wed, 02 Jan 2013 06:59:18 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-7147 […] but still are getting big cuts from before the Bush tax cuts were made. And the recent trend of treating trust fund babies as the absolute most favored taxpayers was continued (though a few of the absolute richest trust fund babies will have to have some taxes […]

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-5873 Mon, 07 Nov 2011 22:16:22 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-5873 […] the strong support for policies to elevate trust fund babies in the USA have created a society where economic wealth in the USA is now greatly defined by how […]

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-5176 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:39:44 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-5176 The very ill advised tax shifting from those earning money in 2001 – 2011 to those earning money later should not be extended. Even calling them cuts is not true. You cut taxes by cutting spending. If you run a deficit all you do by “cutting taxes” is shift the tax from today to your kids. We shouldn’t do that…

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-4800 Mon, 07 Dec 2009 04:48:08 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-4800 […] I have said previously, capitalists support the estate and inheritance taxes. Not those that see themselves as nobility, and call wish to be called capitalists, that want to […]

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-3222 Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:15:39 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-3222 New rules will be put in place. Plenty of people will pay politicians plenty of money to assure their methods of subverting the intent of those rules are allowed to continue. To change things you would need to vastly improve the intellectual rigor of decision making…

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1799 Sun, 27 Jan 2008 18:17:01 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-1799 This is not the way the story is normally told. Social Security is actually in good shape for at least 30 years…

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-1694 Fri, 18 Jan 2008 02:01:13 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-1694 […] Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are two of the richest people on the planet (though many are gaining on them recently). Both have pledged to give away nearly all (over 99%) of the money they have earned to charity […]

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-774 Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:30:22 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-774 […] Huge deficits created by spending tons of money that you don’t have, is just taxing your grandchildren. […]

]]> http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-168 Wed, 04 Jul 2007 12:42:50 +0000 http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2006/10/15/estate-tax-repeal/#comment-168 Mr Buffett said that he was taxed at 17.7 per cent on the $46 million he made last year, without trying to avoid paying higher taxes, while his secretary, who earned $60,000, was taxed at 30 per cent…

]]>