• curiouscat.com
  • About
  • Books
  • Glossary
   
       
   
       

    Categories

    • All
    • Cool (24)
    • Credit Cards (15)
    • Economics (147)
    • Financial Literacy (109)
    • Investing (73)
    • Personal finance (112)
    • Popular (17)
    • quote (55)
    • Real Estate (45)
    • Retirement (24)
    • Saving (35)
    • Stocks (40)
    • Taxes (26)
    • Tips (60)
  • Tags

    appropriate technology Asia bonds books capitalism chart China commentary credit Credit Cards credit score curiouscat data debt economic data Economics economy energy entrepreneur fed federal debt Financial Literacy government health care housing inflation interest rates Investing micro-finance mortgage Personal finance personal finance basics photos Real Estate regulation Retirement save money Saving social security spending money Stocks Taxes Tips travel photos Warren Buffett
  • Recently Posts

    • Bad News on Jobs
    • Frugality Plus
    • Disease Prevention For Healthy America
    • More Americans Working Into Late 60’s and Beyond
    • Google’s Underwater Cables
    • 10 Things Your Bank Won’t Tell You
    • Guy Kawasaki on Innovation
    • Kiva Fellows Blog: Nepalese Entrepreneur Success
    • 8 Million New Potential Victims of Identity Theft
    • Save Money on Printing
  • Blogroll

    • Brad Setser
    • Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
    • Freakonomics
    • I Will Teach You to be Rich
    • Jubak’s Journal
  • Links

    • Articles on Investing
    • fool.com
    • Investing Books
    • Investment Dictionary
    • Leading Investors
    • Marketplace
    • Trickle Up
  • Curious Cat Kivans

    • Making a Difference

Investing and Economics Blog

Is Google Overpriced?

Don’t go gaga over Google by Geoff Colvin, Fortune senior editor-at-large:

It has created more investor wealth in less time than any company in history. So investors, repeat after me: All hail, Google! But don’t put it in the wealth-creation pantheon quite yet. And please don’t buy it at today’s price.
…
we need to remember that the ringing superlatives are based on a stock price that’s nuts. Google is a terrific company that may one day deserve to sit beside GE, Exxon and Microsoft. But not yet.

He is welcome to his opinion. Lets look at some previous opinions, August 2004 Wall Street Week transcript:

COLVIN: There’s another question. We now have a company that people have to decide whether they want to invest in. $23 billion is a high valuation for a search engine, right? I mean…
KIRKPATRICK: For anything.
COLVIN: For anything. And, you know, we can remember when AltaVista was everybody’s favorite search engine. Google came along, better product, superior, took away the market, but who’s to say the same thing won’t happen to them?
SCHLOSSER: Well, they are creative guys, though. I mean I have a lot of faith that they’ll come up with some new ideas down the road that we’ll be able to watch for years to come.
COLVIN: What do you think, David? Is this valuation justified?
KIRKPATRICK: Well, I would never say that. I think any kind of valuation at this sort of level is very, very hopeful about future opportunity.

It is true Google is priced to perform well today (and if they fail to do so the price will go down). And I don’t think it is as good a buy today as it was at $185 (I foolishly didn’t buy at IPO). I did buy more earlier this year, which I am happy to put away for a decade and see where it is then. It is great if you can buy a good stock cheaply but often you are better paying more for a very well managed company than buying cheap companies (by PE, cash flow or EVA or whatever measure you want to use). When I started the 10 stocks for 10 years portfolio in 2005 I put 12% in Google which has increased 134% (along with 12% in Toyota, which is up 67%, and Dell which is down 15%). Google is actually the 3rd best performer as of today (Amazon, up 136%, moved ahead and PetroChina is up 140%). I don’t think Google investors are betting on impossible growth, but time will tell. And the internet makes it easy to see what people predicted previously so we can all see who was right in 5 or 10 years.

I do think at these prices Google is a riskier investment (with lower likely returns) than is was at lower levels (Amazon too). While this may seem obvious, it really is not as obvious as it may seem. If Google’s prospects had improved more than the price increased then at a higher price I might see it as a safer, or possibly better investment… This is what happened when I first bought Google at maybe $190 - after not buying at the IPO. Basically I do not believe Google’s prospects have not increased as much as the stock price in the last 2 years. Certainly I could understand passing up investing in Google today (if so, I would keep a watch out and consider buying if it falls…) but I am perfectly happy to keep my holdings.

Read this article from Fortune (not by Colvin) in 2004, GOOGLE @ $165 Are these guys for real? some quotes:

But the doubters–and there are many–point to shadows in the nursery: questions about Google’s geeky, dot-com-era management style and the possibility that it can’t cope with growth; recent sales of stock by insiders and other major stakeholders (including Time Warner, FORTUNE’s parent and owner of AOL, which lately unloaded $188 million worth); and increasing pressure from Microsoft, Yahoo, and other formidable rivals that would like to crush this infant in its crib
…
Goldman Sach’s Anthony Noto recently assumed that earnings could also rise by a 25% annual rate through at least 2009, which then justified his new “target price” of $215.

Now let’s check such math and figure out just where it implies Google might be ten years out. Assuming 20% annual returns from that $165-a-share level (a reasonable investor expectation given the risks), its market cap would soar from around $45 billion today to $278 billion by 2014. That is a lofty height where only a handful of blue chips stand today–GE, Exxon Mobil, Wal-Mart, Citigroup, Pfizer, and Microsoft, to be precise. Dazzling? Yes. Doable? Only if everything over the next ten years goes right.

via: Google Investors Betting on Impossible Growth

July 25th, 2007 by John Hunter | | Tags: Investing, Stocks

Comments

3 Comments so far

  1. Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Great Speech by Marissa Mayer on Innovation at Google on August 8, 2007 9:40 pm

    [...] far every time I hear one of Google’s leaders speak I am happier that I own a bit of stock - this is another instance of [...]

  2. Maggie on August 13, 2007 6:53 am

    Google is overpriced by almost any model. The prev poster is one of those ‘hopers’ who think there is free money. Google have had a clear ruin at it for a while, but nothing stays the same. Look at altavista, for example. If you look at the chart for the entire dow, its DOWN, dude. Probably for a while.

  3. Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Google Offers $10 Million in Awards for Google Phone Development on November 12, 2007 1:09 pm

    Those selected will then be eligible for even greater recognition via ten $275,000 awards and ten $100,000 awards. Once again Google is showing they understand how to manage in the new world…

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

Copyright © Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog

    Personal Finance

    • Credit Card Tips
    • IRAs
    • Investment Risks
    • Loan Terms
    • Saving for Retirement
  • Archives

      All Posts
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • October 2005
    • July 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • April 2004
TopOfBlogs