• curiouscat.com
  • About
  • Books
  • Glossary
   
       

    Categories

    • All
    • carnival (24)
    • Cool (34)
    • Credit Cards (41)
    • economic data (12)
    • Economics (390)
    • economy (84)
    • Financial Literacy (246)
    • Investing (252)
    • Personal finance (297)
    • Popular (37)
    • quote (178)
    • Real Estate (106)
    • Retirement (54)
    • Saving (79)
    • Stocks (117)
    • Taxes (43)
    • Tips (120)
    • Travel (4)
  • Tags

    Asia banking bonds capitalism chart China commentary consumer debt Credit Cards credit crisis curiouscat debt economic data Economics economy employment energy entrepreneur Europe Financial Literacy government health care housing interest rates Investing Japan John Hunter manufacturing markets mortgage Personal finance Popular quote Real Estate regulation Retirement save money Saving spending money Stocks Taxes Tips USA Warren Buffett webcast
  • Recently Posts

    • USA Apartment Market in 2011
    • 243,000 Jobs Added in January Bring the USA Unemployment Rate Down to 8.3%
    • Curious Cat Investing, Economics and Personal Finance Carnival #24
    • USA Spends $7,960 Compared to Around $3,800 for Other Rich Countries on Health Care with No Better Health Results
    • Apple’s Impossibly Good Quarter
    • Health Care in the USA Cost 17.9% of GDP, $2.6 Trillion, $8,402 per person in 2010
    • Looking at GDP Growth Per Capita for Selected Countries from 1970 to 2010
    • Curious Cat Investing, Economics and Personal Finance Carnival #23
    • 12 Stocks for 10 Years: January 2012 Update
    • USA Adds 200,000 Jobs in December, Unemployment Rate Falls to 8.5%
  • Blogroll

    • Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
    • Freakonomics
    • I Will Teach You to be Rich
    • Jubak Picks
  • Links

    • Articles on Investing
    • fool.com
    • Investing Books
    • Investment Dictionary
    • Leading Investors
    • Marketplace
    • Trickle Up
  • Subscribe

    • RSS Feed

    Curious Cat Kivans

    • Making a Difference

Investing and Economics Blog

FDIC Study of Bank Overdraft Fees

According to the FDIC study of bank overdraft programs during 2007, 75% of banks automatically enrolled customers in automated overdraft programs (which charge high fees). By contrast, 95% of banks treated linked-account programs as opt-in programs, requiring that customers affirmatively request to have accounts link (which are normally do not charge customers high fees).

Automated overdraft usage fees assessed by banks ranged from $10 to $38, and the median fee assessed was $27. About one-fourth of the surveyed banks (24.6 percent) also assessed additional fees on accounts that remained in negative balance status in the form of flat fees or interest charged on a percentage basis.
Fees assessed for linked-account and overdraft LOC programs were typically lower than for automated overdraft programs. Almost half of the banks with linked-account programs (48.9 percent) reported charging no explicit fees for the service. The most common fee associated with linked-account programs was a transfer fee; where charged, the median transfer fee was $5.

There really is no excuse (other than trying to gouge your “customers”) for these fee levels. Charging any money to just move money from a customers saving account to checking account is just making it obvious the bank doesn’t want to serve the bank wants to take money from you. The banks in the sample used by FDIC earned an estimated $1.97 billion in NSF-related fees in 2006, representing 74 percent of the $2.66 billion in service charges on deposit accounts reported by these banks.

Consumer complaints about automated overdraft programs were received by 12.5 percent of banks that operated these programs, compared with consumer complaints from less than 1.0 percent of banks offering linked-account programs and 1.5 percent of banks offering overdraft LOC programs. Complaints about automated overdraft programs were more common for large institutions than for small institutions (21.7 percent versus 10.6 percent).

A small fee when lending the customer money may be justified but the banks seem to just operate in order to have a big pool of people to catch them with big fees. The model seems to be if we get more “customers” we can catch more of them with one fee or another. It is not an honorable business model to try and catch your customers with huge fees for minor items.

Make sure you have a free linked-account overdraft protection that will tap your saving account if your checking account falls below 0. If they don’t have such a free program, choose a bank or credit union that does. Also an overdraft line of credit might be wise. If the fee is more than $10, go somewhere where they are not so greedy. You also will owe interest on your borrowings (probably a ludicrously high interest rate).

Related: Don’t Let the Credit Card Companies Play You for a Fool – 10 Things Your Bank Won’t Tell You – Hidden Credit Card Fees – FDIC Limit Raised to $250,000

January 9th, 2009 by John Hunter | 2 Comments | Tags: Personal finance, Tips

Comments

2 Comments so far

  1. Financial Services for the Poor from the Gates Foundation at Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog on August 11, 2009 9:31 am

    [...] FDIC Study of Bank Overdraft Fees – Microfinancing Entrepreneurs – Incredibly Bad Customer Service from Discover Card [...]

  2. Lying to Customers – No Surprise A Bank Does It at Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog on October 28, 2009 11:50 am

    [...] FDIC Study of Bank Overdraft Fees – Ignorance of Many Mortgage Holders – Don’t Let the Credit Card Companies Play [...]

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

« Stock Markets Down $30 Trillion for 2008
Madoff ‘victims’ do math, realize they profited »
Copyright © Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog

    Personal Finance

    • Credit Card Tips
    • IRAs
    • Investment Risks
    • Loan Terms
    • Saving for Retirement
  • Archives

      All Posts
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • October 2005
    • July 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • April 2004