• curiouscat.com
  • About
  • Books
  • Glossary

    Categories

    • All
    • carnival (41)
    • chart (8)
    • Cool (35)
    • Credit Cards (45)
    • economic data (62)
    • Economics (439)
    • economy (126)
    • Financial Literacy (292)
    • Investing (324)
    • Personal finance (356)
    • Popular (43)
    • quote (194)
    • Real Estate (120)
    • Retirement (65)
    • Saving (90)
    • Stocks (158)
    • Taxes (51)
    • Tips (129)
    • Travel (7)

    Tags

    Asia banking bonds capitalism chart China commentary consumer debt Credit Cards credit crisis curiouscat debt economic data Economics economy employment energy entrepreneur Europe Financial Literacy government health care housing India interest rates Investing Japan John Hunter manufacturing markets micro-finance mortgage Personal finance Popular quote Real Estate regulation Retirement save money Saving spending money Stocks Taxes Tips USA

    Recently Posts

    • New Health Care Insurance Subsidies in the USA
    • Individual Stock Portfolio Investment Planning
    • Finding Great Investments Keeps Getting Harder
    • Huge Growth in USA Corporate Debt from 2005 to 2020
    • Retirement Portfolio Allocation for 2020
    • Tencent Gaming
    • Tucows: Building 3 Businesses With Strong Positive Cash Flow
    • The 20 Most Valuable Companies in the World – Jan 2019
    • 20 Most Popular Posts on the Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog in 2018
    • An Inverted Yield Curve Predicts Recessions in the USA
  • Blogroll

    • Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
    • Freakonomics
    • I Will Teach You to be Rich
    • Jubak Picks
  • Links

    • Articles on Investing
    • fool.com
    • Investing Books
    • Investment Dictionary
    • Leading Investors
    • Marketplace
    • Trickle Up
  • Subscribe

    • RSS Feed

    Curious Cat Kivans

    • Making a Difference

Investing and Economics Blog

Data on the Largest Manufacturing Countries in 2008

Manufacturing is an powerful driver of economic wealth. For years I have been providing data to counter the contention that the manufacturing base of the USA is gone and the little bit left was shrinking. The latest data again shows the USA is the largest manufacturer, and manufacturing in the USA continues to grow. It is true global manufacturing has begun to grow more rapidly than USA manufacturing in the last few years. I doubt many suspect that the USA’s share of manufacturing stayed stable from 1990 to 1995 then grew to 2000 took until 2006 to return to the 1990-1995 levels and then has declined in 2007 and 2008 a bit below the 1990 level and during that entire time was growing (even in 2007 and 2008).

The USA’s share of the manufacturing output, of the countries that manufactured over $185 billion in 2008, 28% in 1990, 28% in 1995, 32% in 2000, 28% in 2005, 28% in 2006, 26% in 2007 and 24% in 2008. China’s share has grown from 4% in 1990, 6% in 1995, 10% in 2000, 13% in 2005, 14% in 2006, 16% in 2007 to 18% in 2008. Japan’s share has fallen from 22% in 1990 to 14% in 2008 (after increasing to 26% in 1995 then steadily falling). The USA has about 4.5% of the world population, China about 20%.

Based on the latest UN Data, for global manufacturing, in billions of current US dollars:

Country 1990 1995 2000 2005 2006 2007 2008
USA 1,041 1,289 1,543 1,624 1,712 1,756 1,831
China 145 300 484 734* 891* 1,106* 1,399**
Japan 810 1,219 1,034 979 927 923 1,045
Germany 438 517 392 571 608 711 767
Italy 240 226 206 295 302 345 381
United Kingdom 206 218 226 264 295 323 323
France 200 233 190 255 255 287 306
Russian Federation 120 64 45 124 157 206 256
Brazil 120 125 96 137 163 201 237
Korea 66 131 136 211 234 260 231
Spain 112 104 98 160 170 196 222
Mexico 62 67 133 154 175 182 197
Canada 92 100 129 168 182 197 195
India 51 61 69 122 141 177 188

* I am using the data from last year that separated the manufacturing data (this year the data does not provide separate manufacturing data for China) instead of that shown in the most recent data (which doesn’t separate manufacturing)
** The China data is not provided for manufacturing alone. The percentage of manufacturing (to manufacturing, mining and utilities) was 78% for 2005-2007 (I used 78% of the manufacturing, mining and utilities figure provided in the 2008 data).

I hope to write a series of posts examining global manufacturing data including looking at manufacturing data specifically (excluding mining and utility data).

This data through 2008, does not yet show the effect of the large worldwide recession: the 2009 data will likely show a global decline.

This data cannot be seen as perfectly accurate, but it is very interesting. Also this data is in current US dollars so historical data changes compared to our past posts (in addition I wouldn’t be surprised if data is updated based on information not available a year earlier – but I don’t see any explanation of if that is done). Still it provides a useful view of global manufacturing activity, especially since there is so many misconceptions about the decline in USA manufacturing.

The decline in USA manufacturing has been trumpeted as a completed fact for decades. It is true, especially China, is gaining large amounts of manufacturing production. But it is only in the last few years (say since 2006) that the USA’s share of global manufacturing is declining.

Such a short term decline, is hardly guaranteed to continue for the long term. But, I think it fairly likely that China will continue to grow. And it is reasonable to guess (based on the recent data, the current situation and trends) that the USA’s proportion of global manufacturing will decline going forward.

However it is likely that USA manufacturing will actually continue to grow – in the face of decades of claims that the USA’s manufacturing base is gone and decreasing. The evidence clearly shows this has not been true no matter how often people repeat the claim.

Manufacturing jobs continue to decline globally. As USA manufacturing jobs decline many leap to the conclusion that the USA manufacturing base is disappearing: which is not true. It is questionable that the USA is loosing more manufacturing jobs than other countries. The data is sparse but I believe by far the largest factor is declining manufacturing jobs globally. If the USA is losing more manufacturing jobs than others, that is a minor factor compared to the overall trend of decreasing jobs globally.

Related: Top 12 Manufacturing Countries in 2007 – Top 10 Manufacturing Countries 2006 – manufacturing data for 2005 – Global Manufacturing Data by Country for 2004

Related to manufacturing job losses: Manufacturing Employment Data – 1979 to 2007 – Manufacturing Jobs Data: USA and China – Worldwide manufacturing job data – Manufacturing Jobs

October 13th, 2009 John Hunter | 9 Comments | Tags: Economics, Investing, Popular, quote

Comments

9 Comments so far

  1. piglet on October 29, 2009 6:13 pm

    Three problems:
    – are these data truly adjusted for inflation?
    – why is there a difference to the 2007 data shown here: http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2008/09/23/top-manufacturing-countries-in-2007/
    – The link to UN you provided does not lead to any manufacturing data. What is the exact source?

    Finally, it would be interesting to know how much of manufacturing output is military related. That no doubt has massively increased.

  2. Curious Cat Investing and Economics Carnival #6 on January 4, 2010 8:31 pm

    Welcome to the Curious Cat Investing and Economics Carnival: we highlight recent personal finance, investing and economics blog posts we found interesting…

  3. USA, China and Japan Lead Manufacturing Output in 2008 at Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog on February 17, 2010 7:50 am

    The first chart shows the USA’s share of the manufacturing output, of the countries that manufactured over $185 billion in 2008, at 28.1% in 1990, 32% in 2000, 28% in 2005, and 24% in 2008…

  4. FCAblog » Richard Murphy’s budget twittering on March 24, 2010 3:50 pm

    Is the UK really the world’s sixth biggest manufacturing nation? Yes

  5. Stanislav on April 22, 2010 12:08 pm

    this is pointless, as for one thing, this table does not take into account exchange rate difference. The ruble in 2008-2009 devaluated 65%, so does this mean that Russian production fell that much? It sure would look like that off of a table in USD.

    You should use neutral dollar or purchasing power parity, not the USD. What happens when the USD tanks?

    Furthermore, this table can easily hide a decline: if the USD value of US manufacturing (through inflation) grew 3% but production fell 2%, your table would still show a 1% increase.

  6. Rafael G. on May 4, 2010 6:52 pm

    Stanislav, the problem is that PPP conversion values are not adequate to compare manufacturing output. The correct way would be to make PPP’s using only manufacturing related prices.

    In this case market exchange rates are more adequate. While they fluctuate rather violently, it is the long run tendency that matters. And, in the long run tendency we have a clear picture here: Russia in relation to the US declined between 1990 and 2000, and increased between 2000 and 2008. This is pretty much consistent with other macroeconomic data.

  7. Richard McCormack on May 25, 2010 7:44 am

    Here’s the problem and it is reflected in one industry after another. China produced 568 million tons of steel in 2009. The United States produced 58 million tons. That is the difference between a 10-story building and a 100-story building. Go from one industry to another and the data is similar:
    Auto Production: U.S. produced 5.7 million vehicles last year (the remainder of purchases were imports). China produced 13.8 million.
    Printed circuit board production in 2008 in the United States was $4 billion, down from $11 billion in 2000. China’s PCB production in 2008 was $16 billion, four-times U.S. production (and that was before the disastrous 2009 fall-off in the United States.
    Machine tools — U.S. 2009 production $2.3 billion; China’s 2009 production $15 billion.
    The list goes on and on and on and on and on. Tell me, how in the world can China be producing less than the United States, unless there is a bad error in how this is measured? Have you gone to any U.S. city in the past year — and seen a single crane on the skyline?

    Richard McCormack, manufacturing news

  8. Is this the start of our decline « Talking Bollocks on July 9, 2010 4:33 pm

    […] UK still has some cards up it sleeve. In 2008 we were the sixth biggest manufacturer after Italy but Russia was at 7 and Brazil at […]

  9. Top 15 Manufacturing Countries in 2009 at Curious Cat Economics Blog on January 4, 2011 8:49 am

    The big, long term story remains the same. China has continued to grow manufacturing output tremendously. I see very little data to support the stories about manufacturing having to leave China to go elsewhere…

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Speak your mind

« 2009 Nobel Prize for Economics
Micro-credit Research »
Copyright © Curious Cat Investing and Economics Blog

    Personal Finance

    • Credit Card Tips
    • IRAs
    • Investment Risks
    • Loan Terms
    • Saving for Retirement
  • Archives

      All Posts
    • March 2021
    • January 2021
    • August 2020
    • March 2020
    • February 2020
    • January 2020
    • May 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • November 2018
    • October 2018
    • August 2018
    • May 2018
    • February 2018
    • January 2018
    • November 2017
    • October 2017
    • September 2017
    • August 2017
    • July 2017
    • May 2017
    • April 2017
    • March 2017
    • February 2017
    • January 2017
    • December 2016
    • November 2016
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • August 2016
    • July 2016
    • June 2016
    • May 2016
    • April 2016
    • March 2016
    • February 2016
    • January 2016
    • December 2015
    • November 2015
    • October 2015
    • September 2015
    • August 2015
    • July 2015
    • June 2015
    • May 2015
    • April 2015
    • March 2015
    • February 2015
    • January 2015
    • December 2014
    • November 2014
    • October 2014
    • September 2014
    • August 2014
    • June 2014
    • April 2014
    • March 2014
    • February 2014
    • January 2014
    • December 2013
    • November 2013
    • September 2013
    • August 2013
    • July 2013
    • June 2013
    • May 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • November 2012
    • October 2012
    • September 2012
    • August 2012
    • July 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • April 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • October 2005
    • July 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • April 2004