Google quarterly earnings are amazing again. Google reported revenues of $3.66 billion for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, an increase of 63% compared to the first quarter of 2006 and an increase of 14% compared to the fourth quarter of 2006. 63% jump to $3.66 billion, very impressive and a 64% increase in earnings.
GAAP operating income for the first quarter of 2007 was $1.22 billion, or 33% of revenues. This compares to GAAP operating income of $1.06 billion, or 33% of revenues, in the fourth quarter of 2006. Non-GAAP operating income in the first quarter of 2007 was $1.41 billion, or 38% of revenues. For 2006, GAAP operating income for the first quarter of 2006 was $743 million, or 33% of revenues.
This type of performance is next to impossible to achieve, which makes it amazing they have achieved it but also unlikely it will continue. Still I am happy to own some Google (and glad I have owned it for awhile).
Related: 10 Stocks for 10 Years Update – Sleepwell portfolio results (largest holdings: Google, Templeton Dragon Fund and Toyota) – Investment Books
Have less than $25K in savings? Get in line
What is a very rough estimate of what you need? Well obviously factors like a pension, social security payments, age at retirement, home ownership, health insurance, marital status… make a huge difference in the total amount needed. But something in the neighborhood of 10-25 times your desired retirement income is in the ballpark of what most experts recommend. So if you want $50,000 in income you need $500,000 – $1,250,000. Obviously that is difficult to save over a short period of time. The key to retirement saving is consistent, long term commitment to saving.
Related: Saving for Retirement – Start Young with 401k and Roth IRA – Retirement Delayed: Working Longer
Victim of Real Estate Bust: Your Pension – Part 2:
The central premise of this post is that risk is being mispriced by the market (by failing to account for the risks bonds… are overpriced). And that when those risks are exposed (for example, as the sub prime crisis builds, recession…) prices will fall. Historically markets do exhibit this pattern – when times are good risks are not fully factored into prices, then those risks are appreciated and prices decline.
Related: adjustable rate mortgage – investment risks – Mortgage Defaults: Latest Woe for Housing – Coming Collapse in Housing? – How Not to Convert Equity – Saving for Retirement
This interesting graph, shows the amount of adjustable rate mortgages due for interest rate adjustments (which will increase mortgage payments for millions of people).
Read more
The Great Risk Shift by Jacob Hacker presents some interesting data. I don’t always agree with his conclusions but I think the information he presents is interesting.
The most interesting piece of data to me: The chance of a 50% drop in income in 1970 was 7% for any person. By 2002 it had grown to 16%. While this seems to include some questionable “data” such as divorces, retirees… Still the fairly steady climb (see chart page 31) from 1970 to 2002 shows this is one factor that should be a consideration in saving and spending plans. Don’t assume you will earn more and more every year. You will likely have some fairly large drops in income during your lifetime. Plan for it.
Some more interesting data in 1992 7.9% of 25-34 year olds in the USA had debt payments over 40% of their income. In 2001 that rose to 13.3%. In 1984 median wealth for families with a head of household 55-64 was 4 1/2 times as wealth as those of 25-34 year olds, in 2003 it was 13 1/2 times as great. (page 99)
While the average 401(k) balance is $47,000 the median balance is $13,000 (a relatively few large balances skew the average to make it much higher).
Overall I tend to look at the data he presents and think people better consider these realities and plan knowing them. Jacob Hacker seems to more often say that this is unreasonable and show the hardships faced by those that either could not plan better (it was out of there hands which I would agree is part of the problem and requires some public policy changes) or who choose not to (which I would find the case more often than he would). Well worth reading in my opinion.
Boomers on brink of retirement wonder if they can afford it:
…
Scholz doesn’t go that far, but he does question the popular notion that most baby boomers are “blowing it” in their preparation for retirement. He says the group’s research showed that, by and large, Americans born between 1931 and 1941 were faring quite well financially during their retirement. “That was very surprising to us,” he says. “So then an interesting question is, does the experience of that generation carry over to households that are younger?”
…
“They’re like, ‘Well, I finally got a cell phone.’ They use a computer but it’s one that’s eight years old. Their cars run forever.” That mindset is far different from most baby boomers, Haunty argues. To them, items once viewed as luxuries are now considered necessities. And, he adds, this “propensity to consume” is even more prevalent among Americans in their 20s and 30s. Haunty says he’s not advocating that baby boomers “save every penny and wear the same jeans they wore 10 years ago. But they’ve got to strike a balance.”
Well said. If you have enough money to afford whatever you want and can maintain an emergency fund, buy disability insurance, buy health insurance, save for retirement, avoid personal debt, save for children’s education… great. If not, then choices need to be made about what is most important and then you get to live with the consequences of those choice.
The Real Threat Isn’t Housing by Michael Mandel:
The massive amount of additional production is a key reason why the U.S. has not faced upward pressure on prices. And good productivity gains gave the economy enough momentum to fight off the disasters of 2001–the terrorist attacks, the stock market crash, the collapse of Enron–with only a minimal recession.
But the bonanza starts to disappear if productivity growth drops much further below its current level. Such a decline is a lot more possible than most economists realize or are willing to accept.
Related: Manufacturing Productivity – Be Thankful for Lean Thinking – Manufacturing Jobs Data: USA and China
Bernanke Calls for Stronger Regulation of Fannie, Freddie
…
His solution: “Tying the portfolios to a purpose that provides measurable benefits to the public would help to ensure that society in general — not just GSE shareholders — receives a meaningful return in exchange for accepting the risks inherent in the portfolios,” Bernanke said in the text of remarks prepared for delivery by satellite to a gathering of community bankers in Hawaii.
Signing a mortgage document is one of the biggest financial actions you will take in your life. Taking the time to understand what you are getting into is important. I suggest you don’t act until you actually understand what it is you are taking on. And if that takes hours or days of reading and research so be it. Don’t find yourself with remorse for acting without understanding what you are doing with such an important financial decision.
On the Curious Cat Investment Dictionary mortgage page we have defined some common mortgage terms and provided links to some excellent resources from the Federal Reserve and HUD as well as several articles from Business Week, including: Understanding the Mortgage Process from the Federal Reserve and Nightmare Mortgages from Business Week.
Buffett’s letter to shareholders. Always a required read for investors.
Interesting. The following (and more in the letter – page 15) is extremely important.
would describe the situation if our imports were $.76 trillion – a full 6% of GDP – and we had no exports.) Making these purchases that weren’t reciprocated by sales, the U.S. necessarily transferred ownership of its assets or IOUs to the rest of the world. Like a very wealthy but self-indulgent family, we peeled off a bit of what we owned in order to consume more than we produced.
Related: On Warren Buffett – 2004 Annual Report by Buffett
I originally setup the 10 stocks for 10 years portfolio in April of 2005. In order to track performance I setup a marketocracy portfolio but had to make some adjustment to comply with the diversification rules. In December of 2006 I announced a new 11 stocks for the next 10 years (9 are the same, I dropped First Data Corporation, which had split into 2 companies and added Tesco and Yahoo.
The marketocracy portfolio won’t let me by Tesco so I don’t have it in that portfolio though I want to and will add it if they let me. I also have not sold Western Union of First Data (the companies resulting from the split of First Data). I still find them reasonable investments, just at this time would not buy them for the next 10 years (but for reasons such as not being able to buy Tesco and diversity rules for Marketocracy I am keeping them for now).
At this time the stocks in the marketocracy portfolio in order of returns – Google (116% return, 15% of the portfolio), PetroChina (88%, 7%), Toyota (85%, 12%), Templeton Dragon Fund (69%, 12%), Cisco (56%, 6%), Amazon (23%, 4%), Yahoo (2%, 4%), British Petroleum (3%, -3%), Intel (3%, -11%), Dell (6%, -32%). The split First Data is probably up about 20% and combined they are 4% of the portfolio. I also have under 2% positions in a couple of stocks and about 15% in cash. I occasionally purchase or sell some amounts (I have sold a small portion of Templeton Dragon Fund and bought some Amazon, Dell, Intel and Yahoo in the last few month). I will sell First Data and or Western Union if the price increases enough. I would also like to find an energy company I like to hold in addition to PetroChina (and would likely sell BP if I find one I like for the long term).