The TIAA CREF site has some valuable retirement planning advice (link updated since some pointy haired boss doesn’t know that web pages must live forever – when are we going to get competent people running web sites?). Take some time to read one of their articles (or read more), for example: Retirement Strategies, a 48 page overview. Yes it requires some time to read but the money involved in retirement is huge. Making the wrong decisions can cost you not $2-5,000 but $100,000, and more, easily. Don’t avoid the steps you need to take to learn cost you.
The key is to get started. If you are relatively young you are lucky, you have decades to learn more and improve your plan. Don’t wait until you are only 10-15 years from retirement. The early you get started the better for you and the more money you will make by choosing wisely. The documents TIAA CREF puts together make it much easier to succeed. We will continue to point out resource to aid your continual quest for financial literacy. It is a long term project.
Our Financial Failings by Neil Irwin, Washington Post:
It has about $3,800 in the bank. No one has a retirement account, and the neighbors who do only have about $35,000 in theirs. Mutual funds? Stocks? Bonds? Nope. The house is worth $160,000, but the family owes $95,000 on it to the bank. The breadwinners make more than $43,000 a year but can’t manage to pay off a $2,200 credit card balance.
That is the portrait of the median American household as painted by the Federal Reserve Board’s Survey of Consumer Finances.
Saving for retirement is not complicated, it is just a matter of priorities. Most people care more about a Starbucks coffee each day (or season tickets, or new shoes, or a new car every couple of years or…) today than saving money for retirement. In a capitalist society we believe in letting people make their economic choices. The choices most of us make (in the USA) lead to the results above.
Read more
Our only hope: retiring later by Jim Jubak
Jim Jubak is definitely worth reading for anyone interested in investing. This column touches on the economic problem of the aging population.
That pretty much has to be part of the solution. While the United States is rich even we are not rich enough to have people work for 40 years and not work for 40 years. Retirement at 65 was set when most people died before or soon after that date. It just is not realistic to think we can live at the standards of living we expect and only work from 25-65.
If people want to cut the standard of living during the 80 years they live that would be one tradeoff they could make. I don’t believe his contention that savings is not a reasonable significant part of the solution (if that is what he means by “The whole world is getting old pretty much all at once, so saving more and investing at higher returns won’t do the trick.”
- The Impact of Aging on Financial Markets and the Economy: A Survey by Barry P. Bosworth, Ralph C. Bryant and Gary Burtless. The Brookings Institution, July 2004
- Aging population makes this deficit scarier, Sue Kirchhoff, USA Today.
The issue of how to deal with the economic consequences of aging population is an important issue to consider today. It is something I need to continue to study. But we also need to be taking action now on things like increasing the full retirement age for Social Security, increasing the saving rate, decreasing the current yearly federal deficit (and private pension liabilities), providing ways for those in their 60′s and 70′s to participate in the economy that work well (probably part time, more flexible work arrangements, etc.).