Oil has fallen to $40 a barrel from nearly $140 less than a year ago. Now that $140 level was the result of a huge spike in the price. But if I owned a bunch of oil (as a country or a company) I sure wouldn’t want to sell it at $40. I would much rather just keep it in the ground and sell it later.
OPEC has reduced quotas in an attempt to react to the global recession. But it strikes me as bad management to sell your resources at these low levels. Now you might have to sell some to service debt and meet fixed expenses. But continuing to sell at these levels instead of just keeping it in the ground and waiting a year or two (or longer) just seems like a very shortsighted action.
Now you would have great difficulty acting on my opinion if you don’t plan ahead. To do so you would need to bank profit when you are selling at high prices so you can ride out low prices without being forced to sell to meet your obligations. And it seems many countries are unable to do that. And my guess is many oil company contracts require production based on what the country wants done.
It just doesn’t seem to me that the I would do much better waiting to sell my oil than sell it at these prices.
Related: Forecasting Oil Prices – Oil Consumption by Country – South Korea To Invest $22 Billion in Overseas Energy Projects – Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog posts on energy
Low Mortgage Rates a Mirage as Fees Climb, Eligibility Tightens
…
“A score of 700 was once near perfect,” said Gwen Muse Evans, vice president of credit policy at Fannie Mae, the government-controlled company that helps set lending standards. “Today, a 700 performs more like a 660 did. We have updated our policy to take into account the drift in credit scores.”
Consumer credit scores, called FICOs after creator Fair Isaac Corp., range from 300 to 850. The average FICO score on mortgages bought by Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae rose to 747.5 in the fourth quarter of last year from 722.3 in 2005, according to Inside Mortgage Finance.
Accunet’s Wickert said that a 660 FICO score would have qualified most borrowers for loans with no upfront fees in the past. Now, someone trying to borrow $200,000 with a 660 score would have to pay a 2.8 percent fee, or $5,600, he said. Even someone with a 719 score would have to pay $1,750 in cash.
The low mortgage rates are attractive but a decision to re-finance (or buy) must consider the long term implications. Also if you are re-financing to take advantage of the low rates consider a 20 year or 15 year loan if you are already well into your 30 year loan. A fixed rate loan is the most sensible option at this time.
Related: Low Mortgage Rates Not Available to Everyone – 30 Year Fixed Mortgage Rates and the Fed Funds Rate Chart – Ignorance of Many Mortgage Holders – Fed Plans To Curb Mortgage Excesses – How Not to Convert Home Equity
Dividends Falling Means S&P 500 Is Still Expensive
A total of 288 companies cut or suspended payouts last quarter, the most since Standard & Poor’s records began 54 years ago, when Dwight D. Eisenhower was president. While the S&P 500 is trading at the lowest price relative to earnings since 1985 and all 10 Wall Street strategists tracked by Bloomberg forecast a rally this year, predictions based on dividends show shares are overvalued by as much as 46 percent.
Just last November the S&P 500 dividend yield topped the bond yield for the first time since 1958. Yields often rise as stock prices fall on future prospects and companies announce dividend cuts after stocks have already fallen (due to the deteriorating conditions the company faces). So you always must be careful not to count dividends before they are paid. As an investor you need to look into the future and see how secure the dividends are likely to be.
Related: 10 Stocks for Income Investors – 10 Stocks for 10 Years – Curious Cat Investing Books
The huge banking bailouts and stimulus bill are meant to counter-balance the huge problems the economy is suffering through. The damage caused to the economy, is largely from unwise risks that were allowed by regulators and politicians that have not panned out and are now greatly damaging the economy. It is always easy for politicians to pay out money in an attempt to buy our way out of problems. That is what the stimulus and bailout bills are doing. They are yet again heaping huge debts on our children and grandchildren.
The bailout and stimulus packages are not about preventing foolish risks to the economy by huge banks that would make the economy safer in the future. Those types of bills are very hard to pass as the politicians get great sums of money to allow people to risk the economy for their own benefit. The concept of the stimulus is not to fix the cause of the problem but do cope with the problem we are left with due to people that paid themselves huge amounts of money. Now the taxpayers get to fund the huge payouts wall street has given themselves.
This is because they never actually provided the value they claimed. They merely created false returns to claim they provided a benefit to justify obscene pay (many of them truly didn’t understand this is what they were doing so beyond failing they were so incompetent [while accepting well over a million dollars a year] they didn’t even understand that the financial games they were playing were failing. It is hard to know what is worse, being so incompetent while claiming you deserve millions or knowing you are just paying yourself money based on false claims of value.
Either way, the banks are left bankrupt – having worthless securities created by those paying themselves huge amounts of money. If the huge banks fail the financial system collapse creates huge problems – businesses that have operated for decades by borrowing some funds (responsibly) go bankrupt because no funds are available to lend them, etc..
The stimulus is not about fixing the problems of the past it is about countering the huge decline from the bubble economy. That bubble economy was funded largely by claiming value where none existed thereby allowing people to spend huge amounts of money based on those faulty claims. How people are shocked that playing financial games doesn’t actually make hundreds of billions of dollars appear out of thin air is beyond me.
Read more
Paul Volcker said some pretty alarming words recently. Volcker: Crisis May be Even Worse than Depression
…
He stressed the importance of preventing financial institutions large enough to pose a threat to the entire system from engaging in risky behavior such as running hedge funds or trading for its own accounts.
He is certainly right on the second point. I must say the decline is bad. And the recent new on jobs and GDP have been bad. It doesn’t strike me as approaching the depression type problems but he didn’t say the economy was approaching a depression, just that the decline was steeper now, perhaps. When he says something like that it makes me at least want to pay a bit more attention to the economy.
Related: Too Big to Fail, is Too Big – Treasury Now (1987) Favors Creation of Huge Banks – Monopolies and Oligopolies do not a Free Market Make
Who Will Buy All the USA’s Debt? That is a question worth thinking about. The USA is a huge net borrower. The government can’t borrow from consumers because they are hugely in debt themselves. Over the last few decades huge investments from Japan, China and the Middle East in USA government debt have allowed the huge amount of federal debt to continue to grow rapidly. But who is going to buy the increasing amounts of debt; in the next few years, and the next few decades?
China is right to have doubts about who will buy all America’s debt
…
The other area of concern for China is the value of its Treasuries. Given the US borrowing requirement and its lax monetary policy, Treasury bond yields could well rise sharply, causing a corresponding price decline. If China’s holdings match Treasuries’ average 48-month duration, then a 5pc rise in yields, from 1.72pc on the 5-year note to 6.72pc, would lose China 17.5pc of its holdings’ value, or $119bn.
Foreign buyers have absorbed a little over $200bn of Treasuries annually, a useful contribution to financing the $459bn 2008 deficit, but only a modest help towards the $1.35 trillion minimum average deficit forecast for 2009 and 2010.
Unless that changes substantially, there will be $1 trillion annually to be raised by the Treasury from domestic sources, more than double the previous record from domestic and foreign sources together, plus whatever is needed to bail out the banks.
Even if the US savings rate were to rise from zero to its long-term average of 8% of disposable personal income, that would create only an additional $830bn of savings — not enough to fund the domestic share of the deficit. Interest rates would probably have to rise substantially to pull in more foreign investors.
Very true. Anyone buying government debt at these rates has reason to question the wisdom of doing so. Exporters to the USA have macro-economic reasons for buying debt (to keep the value of the dollar from collapsing) but the investing reasons for buying USA debt I find very questionable (I wouldn’t be buying it as an investment, if I were them).
Related: Personal Saving and Personal Debt in the USA – Americans are Drowning in Debt – USA Federal Debt Now $516,348 Per Household – Is the USA Broke?
China and USA exports and imports have been dropping sharply. The USA has decreased the excess consumption over production by $20 billion a month (from $60B to $40B monthly deficit). China maintains a trade surplus and as imports drop faster than export this is actually increasing on a percentage basis.
Can the improvement in the US trade balance continue?
…
Deficits and surpluses are shrinking globally now that the price of oil is at levels that roughly cover the oil exporters imports.* Right now China’s (growing) surplus is clearly the main counterpart to the United States’ (shrinking) deficit.
It is hard to put lipstick on a pig (or even an ox):
Related: The Budget Deficit, the Current Account Deficit and the Saving Deficit – Top 12 Manufacturing Countries in 2007 – Personal Saving and Personal Debt in the USA – Charge It to My Kids
GDP slides 3.8%, worst since 1982
…
“All of this points towards real GDP declining faster in the first quarter than the fourth quarter,” Levy said. Another bad portent was a sharp decline in exports. U.S. sales to other countries had been strong in recent years, boosted by high demand overseas and the relatively low value of the dollar. But that situation reversed sharply in the last three months of 2008, with exports plummeting 19.7%.
According to the International Monetary Fund, the decline in the U.S. is matched by other leading economies, which contracted about 5.5% in the fourth quarter of 2008.
The decline was a bit less than anticipated but obviously shows an economy in serious trouble. U.S. GDP Falls At 3.8 Percent Pace In 4th Quarter
The Commerce report showed consumer spending – which accounts for a whopping two-thirds of U.S. economic activity – fell another 3.5 percent in the fourth quarter after declining 3.8 percent in the third quarter. Spending on durable goods such as cars and furniture plunged 22.4 percent, the steepest decline since the first quarter of 1987.
As I have been saying for awhile the economy is in trouble and 2009 looks to be difficult. We should be happy if a recovery is underway in the 4th quarter of 2009 and we have not too drastically increased the burden on the future to pay for current spending.
Related: Financial Market Meltdown (Oct 2008) – Cracks in US Economy? (Dec 2006) – Fed Continues Wall Street Welfare – Forecasting Oil Prices – Crisis May Push USA Federal Deficit to Above $1 Trillion for 2009
I do not like the actions of many in “private equity.” I am a big fan of capitalism. I also object to those that unjustly take from the other stakeholders involved in an enterprise. It is not the specific facts of this case, that I see as important, but the thinking behind these types of actions. Which specific actions are to blame for this bankruptcy is not my point. I detest that financial gimmicks by “private capital” that ruin companies.
Those gimmicks that leave stakeholders that built such companies in ruin should be criticized. It is a core principle that I share with Dr. Deming, Toyota… that companies exist not to be plundered by those in positions of power but to benefit all the stakeholders (employees, owners, customers, suppliers, communities…). I don’t believe you can practice real lean manufacturing and subscribe to this take out cash and leave a venerable company behind kind of thinking.
How Private Equity Strangled Mervyns
When those firms bought Mervyns from Target for $1.2 billion in 2004, they promised to revive the limping West Coast retailer. Then they stripped it of real estate assets, nearly doubled its rent, and saddled it with $800 million in debt while sucking out more than $400 million in cash for themselves, according to the company. The moves left Mervyns so weak it couldn’t survive.
Mervyns’ collapse reveals dangerous flaws in the private equity playbook. It shows how investors with risky business plans, unrealistic financial assumptions, and competing agendas can deliver a death blow to companies that otherwise could have survived. And it offers a glimpse into the human suffering wrought by owners looking to turn a quick profit above all else.
Too much debt is not just a personal finance problem it is a problem for companies too. Continue reading on my original post on the Curious Cat Management Blog.
Related: Leverage, Complex Deals and Mania – Failed Executives Used Too Much Leverage – posts on debt
How Should Parents Teach Teens About Credit Cards? by Nancy Trejos
…
there are prepaid cards targeted specifically at teens, such as the Visa Buxx card. With such a card, Bellamkonda would be able to log in and monitor his daughter’s spending online
…
Bill Hardekopf, chief executive of LowCards.com, said parents should pull out their own credit card bills and talk their children through them. Explain the interest rate, minimum payments, grace period and finance charges. If they’ve had late fees or payment problems, they shouldn’t hide them. “Use these as teaching examples,” he said. “Getting a teenager a credit card while she lives in your home is a great teaching opportunity on finances.”
I agree it is wise to explain the use of credit cards to teenagers. I also agree it is wise to have them actually use their own card, assuming they aren’t unreasonably immature and have shown an understanding of personal finance.
Books: Money Sense for Kids – Growing Money: A Complete Investing Guide for Kids – The Motley Fool Investment Guide for Teens – Raising Financially Fit Kids – A Smart Girl’s Guide to Money: How to Make It, Save It, And Spend It
Related: Teaching Children About Money Matters – Student Credit Cards – Majoring in Credit Card Debt